Judge Sotomayor is in our court for now for hearing for the time being, and for the duration, Congress must rise to its duty to determine if she understands sovereignty of the people over our servants. My question is not try to subject the Court to the will of the people, but to make Congress subject to the will of the people in who is seated on the bench. It is the test we should insist on for all nominees and for ourselves, is it not?

________________________________________________

The power of the People is not merely in Voice, it is in genuine Supreme Authority. Read more about our independence from our own public servants at the Good For The Country Bookstore,

This week some Southern California Church Leaders came to that very same conclusion, and took up a position advocating not only a very discreet security presence of professionals, but also took the advice of their consultants and adopted the policy of advocating concealed carry of handguns among the congregation. Permit required, please.

Realities are the core of solving the problem of church violence, and having the stomach to face those realities and to meet them. For too long, for example, employers, churches, schools and others have said many different ways that they are sad to see that things have to come to this, but this is a trap which serves not the people, but the killers. Other objections have also delayed facing the reality of how best to meet the reality of murders and mayhem on campus. Fifteen Southern California church leaders refused to fall into that trap, and they sought out expert advice. It involves concealed carry of handguns in church, and they took it. Yes, concealed carry of handguns by the members who come to worship.

This is huge. Especially in California.

The Southern California churches’ consultant is Interfaith Intruder Response, a security firm who respects church worship and sanctuary deeply while elaborating specific realities the church needs to accept in where threat assessment is a new function. Some of those realities involve not only understanding how families fall apart or how political sentiment can act out, but how to meet it with action at the most critical moments, and some of that action may involve lethal force of their own. I might be just as good an idea to have, for instance, a CPR program for every large gathering of people.

Other churches around the nation have their own story to tell on the subject of not only how they have become pro-active and prepared, as in Bring-Your-Gun-To-Church Day has done, but also real experience in stopping murderous assailants the moment the assault begins. It works. So does announcing it publicly. Very shrewd.

Some of the most helpful components of the one-day course from Interfaith Intruder Response is how the church is urged to accept a new understanding, such as grasping the tactical in the moments between a violent attack and the arrival of police not as incapacitating, but as opportunity to stop them cold. Cases of mass murder of congregants taught to offer no resistance ("Give them what they want") hasn’t cut it, and instructions on how to hide or even to urge children to toss books at an active shooter do about as much. Yes, some have taught the kids to throw books.

The answer is not to ban handguns from visiting parents, or to arm faculty who may or may not be present at the critical moment, or to have uniformed guards who are so easily recognized, but to do as these churches are now announcing: discreetly invite the armed citizen to join you, fellow congregants who wear a concealed sidearm when they come to services. These congregants who have a concealed carry permit are welcomed now. 

Killers can kill in moments before a request for aid can even be processed, much less dispatched and on-scene. Not all killers use guns. Many have a knife, and a knife does not run out of ammunition. Some acts involve multiple assailants. The law in nearly all states is on the side of the target when it comes to life-threatening danger and the use of lethal force in reasonable response. Individuals may use lethal force when in reasonable apprehension of grave danger. Individuals may come to the aid of another. For these churches, perhaps their authority and law were the easy part. The hard part was more likely understanding better where their religious authority would lie in even consulting experts on the subject of violence. To the comfort of many, several liberty purists have commented on Christian authority in the righteous use of force. Some of that insight has been part of the Gun Rights Policy Conference which is held every year in September. [Please go to KeepAndbearArms.com for instance on this very important issue.] A lot of Christians are gun owners. Millions of us.

Gun owners, who number around 90 million adults right about now, are part of an interesting finding by experts who research the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report among other sources. The finding is that about 2.5 million times every year, someone, somewhere in America uses their personal gun to stop a violent crime in progress, and only a tiny percentage of those even see the need at the last second to fire their weapon. Death by citizen in justifiable homicide for 2007, for instance, was only 194 reports. 2.5 million non-shootings is a lot of crimes stopped without violence, but which were de-escalated in the absence of police. Those were stopped on citizen authority and their superior force, the same authority we give police. These de-escalated a potential crime millions of times.

There are reports in 2008 and 2009 of how specific church assaults were similarly interrupted by an armed citizen and to a happy conclusion.

Let me emphasize my support and praise for any church or school or workplace who elects to go concealed carry on its premises: It took a lot of courage and faith to make it policy that armed members with concealed carry permits may attend church armed. To invite them, as a matter of fact.

More than forty states have some provision for concealed carry, and some states have no requirement for a permit to carry open or concealed.  This is because this majority recognizes citizen authority to act in fighting crime; that law enforcement derives its own authority from that of the people it serves and not the other way around. The major cities, though, seem to balk at this.

How we meet and fight crime in America in the major cities may begin to turn around to reduce violence on our authority, and when it begins with schools (colleges who have affirmed concealed carry for years) and churches, we build a very useful community contact.